Within hours, clips of the confrontation flooded social media, racking up millions of views. Hashtags like #FireMelissa, #BiasAtTheGate, and #StandWithKaroline trended nationwide. The airline’s initial statement—vague and corporate—only intensified public anger, prompting users to demand a stronger response.
Then came the second blow: a clearer video angle, posted by another passenger, revealed Melissa making a snide remark referencing Karoline’s political affiliation just before denying her boarding. That clip removed any doubt.
By the next morning, the airline confirmed Melissa’s termination, acknowledging that her conduct “violated the company’s expectations of professionalism, impartiality, and service.”
Legal analysts say that had Leavitt chosen to pursue action, she could’ve consulted civil rights attorneys, or even employment discrimination lawyers, depending on the scope of claims.
Some mentioned that in similar cases, settlements involving emotional distress, defamation, or public humiliation can lead to significant legal compensation payouts.
Choosing Dignity Over Legal Action—But Not Without Cost. Leavitt, for her part, declined to escalate the matter through a formal legal route. Instead, she addressed the public through a short, composed video posted to her social channels.
