Cruz proposed a bill requiring financial disclosures from all justices—liberal or conservative. He claimed this would “level the playing field” and remove political bias.
Democrats dismissed the move as performative, calling it a distraction. But GOP lawmakers said it was necessary given the double standard at play.
Even some moderates expressed concern over escalating rhetoric. “There’s a difference between scrutiny and sabotage,” one independent senator commented.
Constitutional scholars weighed in, warning of long-term damage to judicial integrity. “If this continues, the Court may lose legitimacy regardless of party,” said one law professor.
In the aftermath, both sides claimed victory in the clash. Kennedy and Cruz stood by their stance, calling it a defense of due process.
Progressives vowed to keep the pressure on, insisting the Court must evolve. But Republicans accused them of trying to stack the bench with political allies. As the debate continues, Americans are left wondering who’s really protecting justice. Ethics reform or political theater—only time will tell.
